Raheel Manji vs Gerhardt Marius Becker Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W L L
Form
W L W L L L L W L LH2H: Manji 1 - 0 Becker
They have played 2 sets in total, with Manji winning 2 and Becker winning 0. The last match between Manji and Becker was at the M15 Maputo, 04-11-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Raheel Manji getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Raheel Manji | 1 |
| Gerhardt Marius Becker | 0 |
M15 Maputo(04-11-2019)
6
2
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bucsa VS Jones PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Raheel Manji Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gregorio Cordonnier
Player
Raheel Manji
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
13
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Raheel Manji
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Raheel Manji
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
51
Total Points Won
40
|
4-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Raheel Manji
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raheel Manji
Player
Preston Brown
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raheel Manji
Player
Devin Badenhorst
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerhardt Marius Becker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Gerhardt Marius Becker
36%
(
20 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
10
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedja Krstin
Player
Gerhardt Marius Becker
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerhardt Marius Becker
Player
Tsholofelo Tsiang
39%
(
19 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Gerhardt Marius Becker
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claudio Grassi
Player
Gerhardt Marius Becker
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gerhardt Marius Becker
Player
Yaseen Ibrahim
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
32%
(
20 of
62)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
14
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (35/28) | Win/Loss | 31% (5/11) |
| 57% (75/57) | Sets Win/Loss | 31% (10/22) |
| 55% (643/528) | Games Win/Loss | 42% (111/155) |
| 58% (30/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 31% (5/11) |
| 60% (3/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 50 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 109 | Total Double Faults | 38 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 259.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 271.63 |
| 56% (798/1422) | 1st Serve % | 51% (187/367) |
| 68% (542/798) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (102/187) |
| 43% (271/623) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (88/180) |
| 54% (74/137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (15/34) |
| 42% (555/1310) | Return Points Win % | 40% (152/384) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (35/27) | Futures W/L | 33% (5/10) |
| 57% (33/58) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (4/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (4/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 89% (36/32) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (5/5) |
| 6% (36/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (5/0) |
| 8% (26/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (11/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
